| Munchausen
Syndrome by Proxy Defined |
|
Nina J. Karlin - Dartmouth Medical School
Class of 1996
Munchausen
Syndrome by Proxy Described
In Munchausen Syndrome by
Proxy, a perpetrator assumes the sick role indirectly (i.e., by
proxy) by feigning or producing illness in another person.
Usually, the perpetrator is a mother who produces the symptoms
or illness in her child of under six years of age (Kahan &
Yorker, 1991). However, cases have been reported with adults as
both perpetrators and victims. The syndrome is well known to
veterinarians. In such cases, a pet's owner fabricates signs and
symptoms in the animal (Sigal et al., 1989).
MSBP is not uncommon; however
its prevalence has not been established. Rosenberg (1987)
considered 117 cases in a review. Schreier and Libow (1993)
postulated that this syndrome is more common than previously
believed, and that many of the cases are not diagnosed.
MSBP ranges from diseases that
are completely imagined to diseases that are fully induced in
the child. The means by which MSBP mothers most frequently
fabricate disease are suffocation, induced seizures, bleeding,
chronic poisoning with ipecac (leading to vomiting), chronic
poisoning with phenolphthalein (leading to diarrhea), and
excrement injection.
Types of
MSBP Perpetrators
Libow and Schreier (1986)
described three major types of MSBP perpetrators: Help Seekers,
Active Inducers, and Doctor Addicts.
Help Seekers are mothers who
seek medical attention for their children in order to
communicate their own anxiety, exhaustion, depression, or frank
inability to care for the child. Case examples of Help Seekers
include homes studded with domestic violence, marital discord,
unwanted pregnancies, or single parenthood.
Active Inducers induce illness
in their children by dramatic methods. These mothers are anxious
and depressed, and employ extreme degrees of denial,
dissociation of affect, and paranoid projection. Secondary gain
for these mothers includes a controlling relationship with the
treating physician and acknowledgment from medical staff as
outstanding caretakers.
The Doctor Addicts are obsessed
with obtaining medical treatment for nonexistent illnesses in
their children. The falsifications of Doctor Addicts consist of
inaccurate reporting of history and symptoms. Such mothers
believe their children are ill, refuse to accept medical
evidence to the contrary, and then develop their own treatment
for their children. The children usually are older than six
years, and the mothers are suspicious, antagonistic and
paranoid. These mothers tend also to be distrustful and angry.
Theories
of MSBP
Many theories exist as to why a
woman may fabricate illness in her child. Common to most
theories is a traumatic loss earlier in the mother's life; such
a loss may be represented by maternal rejection and the lack of
love and attention as an infant. It may also be representative
of the "loss of a parent, loss of a parent's love through
neglect or abusive treatment, or loss of self through childhood
illness or traumatic disillusionment" (Bach, 1991).
Help Seekers are thought to be
making an uncomplicated cry for help. Unlike the more typical
MSBP parent, who will shun therapy and refuse placement of her
child in a protective agency, these mothers readily acquiesce to
both measures.
Active Inducers and Doctor
Addicts use the relationship with the doctor to attempt to
repair earlier traumatic losses (Libow & Schrier, 1986).
These mothers express rage engendered by the earlier loss by
devaluing and deceiving physicians and medical staff in a game
of false illness. By devaluing the physician, these mothers
create for themselves protection, recognition, and security, all
of which they violently crave. In other words, such mothers use
their "sick" children to create a relationship,
cemented by lying, with a physician. However, it is this very
relationship which provides them with nurture and "protects
them from despair" (Schreier, 1992).
Warning
Signs of MSBP
Typical features and warning
signs of MSBP include one or more of the following: a prolonged,
unusual multi-system illness with incongruent symptoms; signs
and symptoms disappear when the parent is absent; one parent
(usually the father) is absent during the hospitalizations; the
general health of the patient clashes with results of lab tests;
and a history of SIDS in siblings (Leonard & Farrell, 1992).
The usual victim is a child less than six years old (Crouse,
1992).
The characteristic behavior of
the parent is pleasant, cooperative, and supportive of the
medical staff; eager to be in the hospital, overly attentive to
her child (takes temperature, administers medication, attempts
to exclude medical support staff); and able to arouse
sympathetic interest and involvement of hospital staff. In
addition, the mother may have a nursing or medical background,
have her own history of Munchausen syndrome, have a history of
marital discord, deny deception, lack the usual parental
concern, and have suicidal ideation or attempt suicide before or
after discovery of the syndrome (Meadow, 1982). The mother may
thrive in the medical environment and enjoy the attention and
care she receives from the health care staff. She may have a
history of frequent use of emergency rooms and ambulances.
Other classic warning signs
include separation anxiety in the child and parental
over-protectiveness. The child may cling to the mother and not
demonstrate age-appropriate behavior (Crouse, 1992). The child
may initially display fear, negativism, and anxiety, and later
progress to a passive, helpless state.
Effects on
the Child
MSBP is not without grave
danger to the child victim. The impact is psychological and
physiological, both short-term and long-term. The more acute
consequences include physical harm induced by the mother or
resulting from multiple medical tests and treatments. For
example, one six year old boy suffered "thirteen months
away from school, five months in the hospital, one month of IV
fluids, and the following procedures: barium meal (2), IV
urogram, skeletal survey, brain scan, EEG (2), biopsies of bone,
kidney, and skin. In addition, he had endoscopy of the upper GI
tract, and over one hundred and twenty venopunctures, "At
the time the deception was revealed he was being considered for
plasmapheresis" (Meadow, 1982).
Cases have been reported where
children developed destructive skeletal changes, limps, mental
retardation, brain damage (from anoxia), immune-mediated
nephritis, and cortical blindness. Often, these children require
multiple abdominal surgeries, each with the risk for future
medical problems (Rosenberg, 1987). The mortality rate is
significant. At the least, it is ten percent (Kahan &
Yorker, 1991).
The psychological ramifications
are chronic and long-standing. These children may learn to view
love from their mother as dependent on their being ill. Thus,
they may help in the deception, or even use self-abuse, in order
to protect themselves against fear of abandonment. Having
learned to identify with illness and to use it as a means of
expression and communication, many victims of MSBP become
Munchausen patients. Thus, factitious illness may be perpetuated
and an intergenerational cycle may develop.
Other significant sequelae
include persistent "intense anxiety, hyperactive behavior,
and a sense of helplessness" (Sigal et al., 1988). The
experience of symbiosis and complicity between mother and child
may affect the child's future behavior. Children under six years
of age may believe that they are responsible for their illness,
i.e., that it is a punishment. This may alter their self concept
and ego strength. Being chronically sick may impinge on the
child s ability to test reality. "It may not be possible to
tell when and if illness is actually present, or if the symptoms
are imagined and/or fabricated" (Sigal et al., 1989).
Finally, in older children, the school absenteeism that results
from multiple hospitalizations brings with it loss of education
and loss of social interactions with peers their own age.
Diagnosis
Because of the consequences for
the child, it is important to confirm or rule out a case
suspicious for MSBP. Meadow (1982) suggests the following
guidelines for diagnosing MSBP:
(1) study the history to
determine which events are real and which are fabricated,
(2) look for temporal
associations between illness events and the mother,
(3) scrutinize the personal,
social, and family history that the mother has given,
(4) contact other family
members,
(5) contact the mother's
physician about a possible history of Munchausen's or
unexplained illnesses,
(6) ensure that the hospital
laboratory stores samples from the child for possible future
screenings,
(7) more carefully monitor
mother and child, possibly by video surveillance,
(8) consider a search of the
mother and her possessions for possible poisons or substances,
(9) most important, exclude the
mother for a day or two and observe whether the symptoms
disappear.
A diagnosis of MSBP can be
safely made when objective evidence (e.g., lab confirmation,
video surveillance) has been collected, when medical and social
histories are characteristic of the disorder, and when clinical
findings are absent or suggest induced illness (Jones et al.,
1986).
American
Psychiatric Association Diagnostic Criteria
The American Psychiatric
Association (1994) criteria for a diagnosis of MSBP are
intentional production of physical or psychological signs and
symptoms in a person under the individual's care, motivation for
perpetrator's behavior is to assume the sick role by proxy,
external incentives for the behavior are absent (e.g., economic
gain), and the behavior is not better accounted for by another
mental disorder.
Management
Once MSBP is confirmed, the
case should be reported to social services and state
authorities, and the physician should request court-ordered
supervision of the case. If the mother repeatedly denies the
allegations, the child must be placed out of the home. Rosenberg
(1987) suggests obtaining court orders for long-term psychiatric
evaluation and treatment of the child and family, and for review
of medical records of all the siblings. Multidisciplinary
management by medical staff, a child protection team, social
services personnel, hospital administration, prosecutors, and
law enforcement administrators is warranted. In court, it is
important to elucidate the risk to the child of permanent
handicap or death, and the psychiatric effects of multiple
hospitalizations (Meadow, 1985).
Successful psychotherapy for
MSBP perpetrators is difficult to achieve. First, the mother s
denial is often so strong that she may not admit to the act.
Second, it is difficult to gain access to the emotional life of
patients who enact rather than verbalize their feelings. Third,
in a therapeutic relationship the patient must tell the truth.
For an MSBP patient, the boundary between truth and non-truth,
between reality and fantasy is greatly blurred (Spivak et al.,
1994).
Psychotherapy should help the
patient to identify and articulate emotional experiences, to
form a relationship no longer based on simulated illness, and to
develop a more authentic and consolidated sense of self (Spivak,
1994). Psychotherapy for MSBP mothers may have a place in cases
where the patient is reasonably well motivated in trying to
confront her difficulties, is of average intelligence, and is
not beset with family and social problems (Nicol and Eccles,
1985). Prognosis in MSBP
Prognosis
in MSBP
What happens to the child
depends to a large extent upon the mother's reaction upon
confrontation. If she agrees to treatment and therapy, her child
may be placed temporarily in a protective agency. If she is
cemented in denial, legal action should be enacted on behalf of
the child, and the child should be monitored well into the
future. In some cases the mother may refuse treatment, deny the
allegation, and even relocate to another state or town (only to
continue with her previous behavior). One MSBP perpetrator was
convicted in Texas for inducing cardiorespiratory arrest in her
two children, and later was reported in Florida for inducing
vomiting episodes in her children (personal communication, Dr.
Frost).
Extreme caution should be taken
in returning a child to the custody of the perpetrating mother.
Even after the involvement of the Children's Protective
Services, these children continue to be victims of maternal
abuse (McGuire & Feldman, 1989). The possibility for
reoccurrence should always be considered in these situations,
and the safety of the child should have first priority.
Potential
for Prevention
Feasible measures for
preventing MSBP include a nation-wide registry of MSBP parents;
training for pediatric and psychiatric residents about this
syndrome; a national electronic network to track and flag MSBP
mothers; and, finally, encouraging school attendance officers to
identify children with a significant number of absences due to
"illness" to the child s pediatrician (Schreier,
1992).
Conclusion
MSBP victimizes children, with
widespread social ramifications. Health care professionals who
work with children play a pivotal role in detecting possible
cases of MSBP. It is important to be cognizant of this syndrome
and to be familiar with steps taken in confirming a case. The
earlier this syndrome is detected, the better the outcome for
the child, the ultimate victim.
|
|
Karl
Friedrich Hieronymus Freihess von Munchausen was an 18th Century
figure who gained fame for his tall tales revolving around his
peripatetic adventures. Richard Asher (1951) coined the term
"Munchausen Syndrome" to characterize patients who
fabricate illness and subject themselves to unpleasant and
potentially harmful medical procedures. Patients with this
disorder travel great distances and recount dramatic, plausible
but, nevertheless, false medical histories. The English
pediatrician Meadow (1977) came up with "Munchausen
Syndrome by Proxy" (MSBP) after discovering that several of
his epileptic patients' mothers had fabricated the children's
symptoms.
Bibliography
American Psychiatric
Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, Fourth Edition. American Psychiatric Association,
Washington, DC, 1994.
Asher, R. (1951). Munchausen's
Syndrome. Lancet, i:339-41.
Bach, S. (1991). On
sadomasochistic object relations. In G.I. Fogel & W.A. Myers
(Eds.)
Perversions and
Near-perversions in Clinical Practice: New Psychoanalytic
Perspectives (75-92). New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
Bools, C.N. and Neale, B.A.
(1992). Co-morbidity Associated with Fabricated Illness
(Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy). Archives of Disease in
Childhood, 67:77-79.
Crouse, K.A. (1992) Munchausen
Syndrome by Proxy: Recognizing the Victim. Pediatric Nursing,
18(3):249-52.
Frost, J.D., Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Hanon, K.A. (1991). Child
Abuse: Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. FBI Law Enforcement
Bulletin, 60:8-11.
Jones, J.G., Butler, H.L., et
al. (1986). Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Child Abuse and
Neglect, 10:33-40.
Kahan, B.B. and Yorker, B.C.
(1991). Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: Clinical Review and Legal
Issues. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9:73-83.
Leonard, K.F and Farrell, P.A.
(1992). Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Postgraduate Medicine,
91(5):197-207.
Libow, J.A. and Schreier, H.A.
(1986). Three Forms of Factitious Illness in Children: When is
it Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy? American Journal of
Orthopsychiatry, 56(4):602-11.
Manthei, D.J., et al. (1988).
Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: Covert Child Abuse. Journal of
Family Violence, 3(2):131-140.
McGuire, T.L., Feldman, K.W.
(1989). Psychologic Morbidity of Children Subjected to
Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Pediatrics, 83(2):289-92.
Meadow, R. (1985). Management
of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Archives of Disease in
Childhood, 60:385-93.
Meadow, R. (1982). Munchausen
Syndrome by Proxy. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 57:92-8.
Meadow, R. (1977). Munchausen
Syndrome by Proxy: The Hinterland of Child Abuse. The Lancet,
ii:343-5.
Nicol, A.R. and Eccles, M.
(1985). Psychotherapy for Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Archives
of Disease in Childhood, 60:344-48.
Rich, S. (June 22, 1922). U.S.
medical "credit card" proposed. San Francisco
Chronicle, 1.
Rosen, C.L., Frost, J.D., et
al. (1983). Two Siblings with Recurrent Cardiorespiratory
Arrest: Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy or Child Abuse? Pediatrics,
71(5):715-20.
Rosenberg, D.A. (1987). Web of
Deceit: A Literature Review of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy.
Child Abuse and Neglect, 11:547-63.
Schreier, H.A. and Libow, J.A.
(1993). Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: Diagnosis and Prevalence.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63(2):318-21.
Schreier, H.A. and Libow, J.A.
(1993). Hurting for Love: Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome. New
York: The Guilford Press.
Schreier, H.A. (1992). The
Perversion of Mothering: Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Bulletin
of the Menninger Clinic, 56(4):421-37.
Sigal, M., Gelkopf, M., et al.
(1989). Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome: The Triad of Abuse,
Self-Abuse, and Deception. Comprehensive Psychiatry,
30(6):527-33.
Sigal, M., Gelkopf, M., et al.
(1990). Medical and Legal Aspects of the Munchausen by Proxy
Perpetrator. Medicine and Law, 9:739-49.
Sigal, M., Carmel, I. et al.
(1988). Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: A Psychodynamic Analysis.
Medicine and Law, 7:49-56.
Sigal, M., Altmark, D. et al.
(1986). Munchausen Syndrome by Adult Proxy: A Perpetrator
Abusing 2 Adults. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174
(11):696-8.
Spivak, H., Rodin, G. et al.
(1994). The Psychology of Factitious Disorders. Psychosomatics,
35(1):25-34.
Waller, D.A. (1983). Obstacles
to the Treatment of Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome. Journal of the
American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 22(1):80-5.
For More
Information:
Common Presentations of MSP and the Usual Methods of
Deception |